Induced Abortion and the Risk of Rh Sensitization.

Importance: While population-level data suggest Rh immunoglobulin is unnecessary before 12 weeks' gestation, clinical evidence is limited. Thus, guidelines vary, creating confusion surrounding risks and benefits of Rh testing and treatment. As abortion care in traditional clinical settings becomes harder to access, many people are choosing to self-manage and need to know if ancillary blood type testing is necessary. Objective: To determine how frequently maternal exposure to fetal red blood cells (fRBCs) exceeds the most conservative published threshold for Rh sensitization in induced first-trimester abortion. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study using high-throughput flow cytometry to detect circulating fRBCs in paired maternal blood samples before and after induced first-trimester abortion (medication or procedural). Individuals undergoing induced first-trimester abortion before 12 weeks 0 days' gestation were included. Paired blood samples were available from 506 participants who underwent either medical (n = 319 [63.0%]) or procedural (n = 187 [37.0%]) abortion. Exposure: Induced first-trimester abortion. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with fRBC counts above the sensitization threshold (125 fRBCs/5 million total RBCs) after induced first-trimester abortion. Results: Among the 506 participants, the mean (SD) age was 27.4 (5.5) years, 313 (61.9%) were Black, and 123 (24.3%) were White. Three of the 506 participants had elevated fRBC counts at baseline; 1 of these patients had an elevated fRBC count following the abortion (0.2% [95% CI, 0%-0.93%]). No other participants had elevated fRBC counts above the sensitization threshold after induced first-trimester abortion. The median change from baseline was 0 fRBCs, with upper 95th and 99th percentiles of 24 and 35.6 fRBCs, respectively. Although there was a strong association between the preabortion and postabortion fRBC counts, no other baseline characteristic was significantly associated with postabortion fRBC count. Conclusions and Relevance: Induced first-trimester abortion is not a risk factor for Rh sensitization, indicating that Rh testing and treatment are unnecessary before 12 weeks' gestation. This evidence may be used to inform international guidelines for Rh immunoglobulin administration following first-trimester induced abortion.

The Rh blood group system and its role in alloimmunization rate among sickle cell disease and sickle thalassemia patients in Iran.

INTRODUCTION: The alloimmunization following blood transfusion can be life-threatening. The Rh alloantibodies are one of the most common causes contributing to alloimmunization. This study aimed to evaluate the rate and causes of alloimmunization and to determine the Rh phenotypes and genotypes among sickle cell disease (SCD) and sickle thalassemia (Sß). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 104 SCD and Sß patients referring to Baghaei 2 Hospital of Ahvaz in 2019 using a non-random simple sampling method. The blood samples were collected for Rh phenotypes, alloantibody screening and identification, and molecular tests. The SSP-PCR and RFLP methods with the Pst 1 enzyme were used. RESULTS: The alloimmunization rate was 9.6% and 13.2% based on immunohematological tests and medical records, respectively. The main alloantibodies (90%) were anti-Rh, and 40% of the patients had multiple alloantibodies. A significant correlation was found between gender and alloimmunization. The phenotypes of DCce (37.5%), DCcEe (24%), Dce (20.2%), and dce (5.8%) and genotypes of R1r (25%), R1R2 (20.2%), R1R1 (18.3%), and R1R0 (10.6%) were the most prevalent. The R1R2 was a frequent genotype in Sß. CONCLUSION: R0r' and R1R0 genotypes were limited to our population in Iran. Due to the differences in RH genotypes between our population and others, the blood transfusion from other ethnicities increased our total alloimmunization rate.

FIGO/ICM guidelines for preventing Rhesus disease: A call to action.

The introduction of anti-Rh(D) immunoglobulin more than 50 years ago has resulted in only a 50% decrease in Rhesus disease globally owing to a low uptake of this prophylactic approach. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, International Confederation of Midwives, and Worldwide Initiative for Rhesus Disease Eradication have reviewed current evidence regarding the utility of anti-Rh(D) immunoglobulin. Taking into account the effectiveness anti-Rh(D), the new guidelines propose adjusting the dose for different indications and prioritizing its administration by indication.

Antenatal and postpartum prevention of Rh alloimmunization: A systematic review and GRADE analysis.

BACKGROUND: Existing systematic reviews of Rh immunoprophylaxis include only data from randomized controlled trials, have dated searches, and some do not report on all domains of risk of bias or evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Our objective was to perform an updated review, by including new trials, any comparative observational studies, and assessing the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE framework. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from 2000 to November 26, 2019. Relevant websites and bibliographies of systematic reviews and guidelines were searched for studies published before 2000. Outcomes of interest were sensitization and adverse events. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane tool and ROBINS-I. The certainty of the evidence was performed using the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized trials and eight comparative cohort studies were identified, evaluating 12 comparisons. Although there is some evidence of beneficial treatment effects (e.g., at 6-months postpartum, fewer women who received RhIg at delivery compared to no RhIg became sensitized [70 fewer sensitized women per 1,000 (95%CI: 67 to 71 fewer); I2 = 73%]), due to very low certainty of the evidence, the magnitude of the treatment effect may be overestimated. The certainty of the evidence was very low for most outcomes often due to high risk of bias (e.g., randomization method, allocation concealment, selective reporting) and imprecision (i.e., few events and small sample sizes). There is limited evidence on prophylaxis for invasive fetal procedures (e.g. amniocentesis) in the comparative literature, and few studies reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: Serious risk of bias and low to very low certainty of the evidence is found in existing RCTs and comparative observational studies addressing optimal effectiveness of Rh immunoprophylaxis. Guideline development committees should exercise caution when assessing the strength of the recommendations that inform and influence clinical practice in this area.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn due to Rh(D) incompatibility: A preventable disease that still produces significant morbidity and mortality in children.

In the mid-20th century, Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn, caused by maternal alloimmunization to the Rh(D) blood group antigen expressed by fetal red blood cells (i.e., "Rh disease"), was a major cause of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, with the regulatory approval, in 1968, of IgG anti-Rh(D) immunoprophylaxis to prevent maternal sensitization, the prospect of eradicating Rh disease was at hand. Indeed, the combination of antenatal and post-partum immunoprophylaxis is ~99% effective at preventing maternal sensitization to Rh(D). To investigate global compliance with this therapeutic intervention, we used an epidemiological approach to estimate the current annual number of pregnancies worldwide involving an Rh(D)-negative mother and an Rh(D)-positive fetus. The annual number of doses of anti-Rh(D) IgG required for successful immunoprophylaxis for these cases was then calculated and compared with an estimate of the annual number of doses of anti-Rh(D) produced and provided worldwide. Our results suggest that ~50% of the women around the world who require this type of immunoprophylaxis do not receive it, presumably due to a lack of awareness, availability, and/or affordability, thereby putting hundreds of thousands of fetuses and neonates at risk for Rh disease each year. The global failure to provide this generally acknowledged standard-of-care to prevent Rh disease, even 50 years after its availability, contributes to an enormous, continuing burden of fetal and neonatal disease and provides a critically important challenge to the international health care system.

Red blood cell alloimmunisation after platelet transfusion (excluding ABO blood group system).

Red blood cell alloimmunisation after transfusion of red blood cell concentrates carries a risk for every recipient. This risk is particularly high for patients with conditions such as sickle cell disease. However, red blood cell alloimmunisation can also occur after platelet concentrate transfusion. All blood group systems other than ABO are affected, and there are several mechanisms responsible for this alloimmunisation. The practical implications of this are a need to match red blood cell concentrates in all alloimmunised patients and, in pregnant women, recongnition of the risk of developing haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. Several measures can be taken to prevent alloimmunisation: in the case of the D antigen, for example, anti-RhD immunoglobulins can be infused before transfusing platelet concentrates from an RhD-positive donor in a RhD-negative recipient.

Mitigation strategies for anti-D alloimmunization by platelet transfusion in haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: a survey of NCCN® centres.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: D-negative patients are at risk of developing an alloantibody to D (anti-D) if exposed to D during transfusion. The presence of anti-D can lead to haemolytic transfusion reactions and haemolytic disease of the newborn. Anti-D alloimmunization can also complicate allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with haemolysis and increased transfusion requirements. The goal of this study was to determine whether cancer centres have transfusion practices intended to prevent anti-D alloimmunization with special attention in patients considered for HSCT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To understand transfusion practices regarding D-positive platelets in D-negative patients with large transfusion needs, we surveyed the 28 cancer centres that are members of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN® ). RESULTS: Nineteen centres responded (68%). Most centres (79%) avoid transfusing D-positive platelets to RhD-negative patients when possible. Four centres (21%) avoid D-positive platelets only in D-negative women of childbearing age. If a D-negative patient receives a D-positive platelet transfusion, 53% of centres would consider treating with Rh immune globulin (RhIg) to prevent alloimmunization in women of childbearing age. Only one centre also gives RhIg to all D-negative patients who are HSCT candidates including adult men and women of no childbearing age. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in platelet transfusion practices for supporting D-negative patients. The majority of centres do not have D-positive platelet transfusion policies focused on preventing anti-D alloimmunization specifically in patients undergoing HSCT. Multicentre, longitudinal studies are needed to understand the clinical implications of anti-D alloimmunization in HSCT patients.

Red blood cell alloimmunisation in transfusion-dependent thalassaemia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic red blood cell transfusion is the first-line treatment for severe forms of thalassaemia. This therapy is, however, hampered by a number of adverse effects, including red blood cell alloimmunisation. The aim of this systematic review was to collect the current literature data on erythrocyte alloimmunisation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the literature which identified 41 cohort studies involving 9,256 patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of erythrocyte alloimmunisation was 11.4% (95% CI: 9.3-13.9%) with a higher rate of alloimmunisation against antigens of the Rh (52.4%) and Kell (25.6%) systems. Overall, alloantibodies against antigens belonging to the Rh and Kell systems accounted for 78% of the cases. A higher prevalence of red blood cell alloimmunisation was found in patients with thalassaemia intermedia compared to that among patients with thalassaemia major (15.5 vs 12.8%). DISCUSSION: Matching transfusion-dependent thalassaemia patients and red blood cell units for Rh and Kell antigens should be able to reduce the risk of red blood cell alloimmunisation by about 80%.

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia secondary to combined anti e and anti C isoimmunisation: a literature review.

A term male infant was admitted at 48 h of postnatal life to the neonatal unit for jaundice. The investigation showed total serum bilirubin (TSB) of 17.1 mg/dl, haemoglobin of 11 g/dl, reticulocyte count of 9.5% and peripheral smear was suggestive of macrocytic, normochromic red blood cell (RBC) with target cells and multiple spherocytes with occasional nucleated RBC. The infant's blood group was B positive. Direct antiglobulin test was strongly positive by gel method (3+). Mother's blood group was B positive and indirect antiglobulin test was positive when tested postnatally. Extended minor blood grouping and cross matching showed this as a case of combined anti e and anti C antibodies isoimmunisation. Infant was treated with phototherapy for 72 h and was shifted to mother side. Infant was serially monitored with TSB level every sixth hourly and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) phototherapy charts were followed to see for rebound hyperbilirubinemia. The neonate was discharged and there was no readmission for hyperbilirubinemia. It is very rare and we report the third case of its type till date.

Facilitators and barriers for RhD-immunized women to become and remain anti-D donors.

BACKGROUND: The successful introduction of prophylaxis with anti-RhD immunoglobulin has resulted in a significant decline of pregnancy-related RhD immunizations but also has decreased the availability of naturally immunized women as (new) anti-D donors. An influx of new donors is necessary to maintain a sufficient pool of anti-D donors. We investigated motivators, barriers, and predictors for anti-D donorship in RhD-immunized women. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A mixed-methods design was applied, including focus group discussions and questionnaires. Two focus groups (including 11 women) served as input for the questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 47.6% of 750 anti-D donors and potential donors completed the questionnaire (50.4% donors; 38% nondonors; 11.6% former donors). Almost 70% of the nondonors would have become donors if they had known about the possibility. Travel time investment was reported as a disadvantage; one-half of donors mentioned no disadvantages. Motivators for anti-D donorship were "doing something in return" (31.2%) and "preventing others having a sick child or losing a child" (33.9%). In multivariable analysis, living single (odds ratio, 5.8; p = 0.02) and living partnered without resident children (odds ratio, 7.9; p = 0.03), compared with living partnered with children, were predictors for anti-D donorship. Not being registered as an organ donor (odds ratio, 0.25; p < 0.001) predicted that the individual would not be an anti-D donor. CONCLUSION: The main barrier for anti-D donorship was a lack of knowledge. Positive predictors of anti-D donorship were living without resident children, altruism, and being registered as an organ donor. A blood bank should develop targeted recruitment strategies with a focus on spreading knowledge about anti-D donorship among RhD-immunized women.

High-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal Rhesus D genotype to guide antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of high-throughput, non-invasive prenatal testing (HT-NIPT) for fetal Rhesus D (RhD) genotype to guide antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin compared with routine antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis (RAADP). DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness decision-analytic modelling. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: A simulated population of 100 000 RhD-negative women not known to be sensitised to the RhD antigen. METHODS: A decision tree model was used to characterise the antenatal care pathway in England and the long-term consequences of sensitisation events. The diagnostic accuracy of HT-NIPT was derived from a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis; estimates of other inputs were derived from relevant literature sources and databases. Women in whom the HT-NIPT was positive or inconclusive continued to receive RAADP, whereas women with a negative result received none. Five alternative strategies in which the use of HT-NIPT may affect the existing postpartum care pathway were considered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs expressed in 2015GBP and impact on health outcomes expressed in terms of quality-adjusted life-years over a lifetime. RESULTS: The results suggested that HT-NIPT appears cost saving but also less effective than current practice, irrespective of the postpartum strategy evaluated. A postpartum strategy in which inconclusive test results are distinguished from positive results performed best. HT-NIPT is only cost-effective when the overall test cost is £26.60 or less. CONCLUSIONS: HT-NIPT would reduce unnecessary treatment with routine anti-D immunoglobulin and is cost saving when compared with current practice. The extent of any savings and cost-effectiveness is sensitive to the overall test cost. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: HT-NIPT is cost saving compared with providing anti-D to all RhD-negative pregnant women.

RHD alleles among pregnant women with serologic discrepant weak D phenotypes from a multiethnic population and risk of alloimmunization.

BACKGROUND: A considerable number of RHD alleles responsible for weak and partial D phenotypes have been identified. Serologic determination of these phenotypes is often doubtful and makes genetic analysis of RHD gene highly desirable in transfusion recipients and pregnant women. We analyzed the RHD gene in a cohort of pregnant women with doubtful D phenotypes. METHODS: RHD genotyping was performed on 104 cases with D typing discrepancies or with history of serologic weak D phenotype. Laboratory-developed DNA tests, RHD BeadChip (Bioarray Solutions, Immucor), and sequencing were used to identify the RHD alleles. RESULTS: Molecular analyses showed 23 of 104 (22%) pregnant women were RHD*weak D types 1, 2, or 3 and not at risk for anti-D. Fifty-one (49%) were RHD*weak partial 4.0, 6 RHD*weak D type 38 (6%), 1 RHD*weak D type 45 (1%), 1 RHD*weak D type 67 (1%), and potentially at risk for being alloimmunized and making anti-D. Partial D was identified in 22 of 104 (21%) patients and definitively at risk for anti-D. DISCUSSION: Appropriate classification of RhD phenotypes is recommended for correct indication of RhIG in pregnant women. However, the serologic distinction between RhD-negative and RhD-positive phenotypes is a difficult task in the case of D variants due to the variations in serologic testing. Our results show a great variability in RHD variant alleles in pregnant women from this population of high admixture. According to these results, 78% of these obstetric patients are at risk for anti-D and candidates for RhIG.

[Anti-D prophylaxis in fetal-maternal erythrocyte incompatibility in Tunisia]. / Prophylaxie anti-D dans l'incompatibilité fœto-maternelle érythrocytaire en Tunisie.

Generalization of postnatal prophylaxis using anti-D immunoglobulins decreased the incidence of erythrocyte fetal-maternal incompatibility (EFMI) in the Rhesus system. Few recent studies have investigated the situation of anti-D prophylaxis in Tunisia and its effects on maternal and neonatal health. The aim of this study was therefore to analyze the situation of anti-D prophylaxis in Tunisia to detect defects and propose solutions. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of IFME cases in the rhesus system in the Department of Medicine and Neonatal Resuscitation of the Tunis Maternity and Neonatology Center (CMNT) during an 8-year period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2015. We collected 51 cases of IFME. The prevalence of IFME was 3.4 per 10 000 live births; 41 % of the patients were transferred in utero and they were from the northwest of the country (17 %). The rate of women with a history of at least one spontaneous miscarriage (SCF) was 45 %. In 42 % of the cases, pregnancies were monitored at local clinics. The search for irregular agglutinins (RAI) was performed in 86 % of the women studied. RAI was positive in 97 % of the cases. Anti-D prophylaxis was correctly performed in only 27 % of the cases. The systematic prophylaxis of the third trimester and a systematic Kleihauer test must be combined with postpartum prophylaxis to better identify dysfunctions and improve the application of the recommendations.

Alloimmunization against platelets, granulocytes and erythrocytes in multi-transfused patients in Iranian population.

BACKGROUND: This study aims at alloantibody screening, determination of the types of these antibodies in multiple-transfused patients with chronic hematologic diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This descriptive study was performed on 240 patients with chronic hematological diseases referred to public hospitals in Iran. Single blood sample was taken and tested for the presence of antibodies. In case of a positive antibody screening, antibody identification was performed using granulocyte agglutination test (GAT), granulocyte indirect immunofluorescence test (GIIFT), platelet indirect immunofluorescence test (PIIFT), monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigen (MAIPA) and panel cells. RESULTS: Out of 240 patients, 105 patients (43.75 %) had been alloimmunized. The incidence of alloantibodies against red blood cells (RBCs) in positive alloantibodies patients were 84.76% (89/105). The most common alloantibody was against antigens of the kell (anti-K) and Rh (anti-E) and (anti D) systems (46.66%, 18.09% and 11.43% respectively). The overall incidence of anti- human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies were 65.7% (69/105). Polymorphonuclear (PMN)-specific antibodies were found in 6.66% (7/105). Also from 105 patients, 14 patients had alloantibodies against platelet. DISCUSSION: In general, it is recommend that to decrease the rate of alloantibody synthesis, the packed cells should be cross matched for minor blood groups especially for Rh (E) and kell. In addition, the use of leukodepleted blood products can decrease the frequency of alloimmunization against platelet (PLT), PMN and HLA antigens.

Variant RHD Types in Brazilians With Discrepancies in RhD Typing.

BACKGROUND: The knowledge of D variants in patients and donors is important because anti-D alloimmunization can occur in some but not all individuals who express a variant RHD allele. Serologic distinction of RhD discrepancies is not always straightforward, which makes molecular analysis highly desirable. METHODS: A group of 223 subjects, 129 patients, and 94 blood donors was identified and analyzed on the basis of a D typing discrepancy. The D antigen expression was evaluated by tube and gel hemagglutination with four anti-D reagents. PCR-single specific primer (SSP), multiplex PCR, RHD BeadChip (Immucor), or sequencing were used for molecular analysis. RESULTS: In total, 168/223 (75%) weak D and 55/223 (25%) partial D variants were identified. Hemagglutination results varied in methods and anti-D reagents used in this process. There was no standard serologic reactivity identified, which could predict what type of D variant would be identified. Among weak D samples, types 1-3 were the most common, while DAR and DVI were most prevalent among partial D samples. CONCLUSION: Our results show that discrepancies found in the serologic typing should be investigated by molecular methods in order to determine the D variant involved and also to distinguish between weak D and partial D. The knowledge of the distribution of weak D types and partial D among populations is important for D- patients and pregnant women management.

Prolonged thrombocytopenia in a child with severe neonatal alloimmune reaction and Noonan syndrome.

Fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAIT) caused by maternal antibodies is the leading cause of severe neonatal thrombocytopenia. A 1-month-old Caucasian girl was referred to our Hematology Clinic for persistent thrombocytopenia diagnosed after a bleeding episode. Diagnostic tests suggested FMAIT. Mild thrombocytopenia persisted for 18 months, and subsequent findings of dysmorphic facies, short stature and mild pulmonary stenosis led to the hypothesis of Noonan syndrome (NS), which was confirmed by genetic test. Other hematological abnormalities were excluded and she had no further bleeding episodes. This case illustrates the possibility of different diagnoses with the same clinical manifestations. The persistence of thrombocytopenia longer than expected associated with typical physical features led to the diagnosis of NS.

Anti-D alloimmunisation in pregnant women with DEL phenotype in China.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse anti-D alloimmunisation in pregnant women with D-elute (DEL) phenotype in China, for developing a predictive model to evaluate whether a person with the DEL phenotype can receive RhD-positive blood. BACKGROUND: Alloanti-D acquired by pregnancy or transfusion is one of the major causes of both haemolytic disease among newborns and haemolytic transfusion reactions. To date, there is little data available about the antigenic properties and immunogenicity of extremely weak D variants known as DEL. METHODS: RHD genotyping and D epitope mapping were performed using gene sequencing and comprehensive immunohaematological methods, respectively. DEL pregnant women carrying an RhD-positive fetus were tested for the presence of alloanti-D. RESULTS: A total of 130 of 142 (91·5%) pregnant women with a DEL phenotype were confirmed to carry the RHD (K409K) allele. Among 12 DEL women who appeared to have RHD-CE-D hybrid alleles, there were 1 RHD-CE (4-7)-D, 7 RHD-CE(4-9)-D, and 4 RHD-CE (2-5)-D alleles. Alloanti-D antibodies were detected in 6 of 142 DEL women, and all the six women had the partial DEL phenotype. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that partial DEL women appear at risk of alloimmunization to the D antigen. RhD immune globulin prophylaxis is necessary for partial DEL women. Partial DEL patients should receive only RhD-negative RBCs, whereas DEL patients with complete expression of antigen can safely receive RhD-positive RBCs.